Additive manufacturing and 3D printing safety

Additive manufacturing builds parts in layers. It includes filament, resin and powder processes with different prevention needs, even though they are all described as 3D printing.

In brief

Assess preparation and finishing as well as the period when the printer is running.

Contents
  1. Identify the actual process first
  2. Tasks outside the printing cycle
  3. Contain hazards before relying on PPE
  4. Review changes in material
  5. Related concepts
  6. References

A–Z dictionary →

Identify the actual process first

A printer melting filament has a different hazard profile from a liquid-resin machine or a metal powder bed system. Assessment must identify materials, additives, temperatures, energy sources and subsequent operations. Safety data sheets provide essential input but do not necessarily describe every emission generated during processing.

Heated materials may release particles and volatile compounds. Resins require assessment of skin contact and cleaning products; powders introduce potential dispersion, fire or explosion hazards according to their properties. A single risk rating cannot represent all3D printing processes, machines and operating conditions.

Tasks outside the printing cycle

Loading materials, sieving powder, removing a part, changing filters or cleaning inside can create more contact than watching printing through a closed chamber. Include nearby workers and maintenance personnel, not just the person programming the machine, when deciding who may be exposed.

Finishing brings additional hazards from cutting tools, sanding, coatings or solvents when these are used. An apparently completed object may retain heat or uncured material. Release for handling must follow the process and manufacturer instructions rather than relying only on the print-complete message.

Contain hazards before relying on PPE

Enclosures and Ventilation and local exhaust ventilation must be selected for the actual contaminants and tasks. A casing alone does not demonstrate emission control when the chamber opens. Location, the number of printers and the time people spend in the room also affect the assessment.

For metal powders, vacuum cleaners, filters, cleaning methods and waste arrangements must suit reactivity and potential combustibility. Not every vacuum cleaner or cleaning liquid is suitable. Respiratory protection and glove selection depend on assessment and complement engineering controls rather than replacing them.

Review changes in material

A filament containing new additives or a different resin warrants review of exposure, storage, cleaning and waste disposal. Record the material and task when investigating odours, visible powder or extraction faults. Lack of smell does not demonstrate lack of exposure. Where significant uncertainty remains, occupational hygiene assessment should determine what to measure and how to verify control effectiveness across the relevant work cycle, including maintenance and post-processing.

References

  1. NIOSH — About additive manufacturing. Official source
  2. NIOSH — 3D printing with metal powders. Official source
  3. HSE — RR1195 Exposure to metal powders in additive manufacturing. Official source
  4. CCOHS — Additive manufacturing. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 2 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra