Agreement 229-2014 on occupational health and safety in Guatemala

Agreement 229-2014 regulates occupational health and safety in Guatemala, with organisational and technical obligations to be read alongside amendments.

In brief

The workplace plan, participation and physical measures must reflect actual work. Amendment 127-2026 affects manual handling of loads.

Contents
  1. What it regulates
  2. Workplace organisation
  3. Plans and registration by branch
  4. Why amendments must be consulted
  5. Application example
  6. Maintaining evidence
  7. Related concepts
  8. References

A–Z dictionary →

What it regulates

Government Agreement 229-2014 establishes Guatemala’s Occupational Health and Safety Regulations. Its content brings together employer and worker duties, preventive organisation and physical workplace conditions. It helps identify obligations applicable to a specific workplace; it is neither a voluntary certification nor a document that can be complied with solely through a company declaration.

Workplace organisation

Preventive organisation includes worker participation, bipartite committees where applicable and the occupational health and safety monitor role. Their functions, training and resources should be defined without assigning all employer responsibility to them. Worker consultation and participation provides information on tasks and risks that does not always appear in procedures.

Plans and registration by branch

The services published by the Ministry of Labour include monitor registration and documentation of the preventive or OHS plan corresponding to each branch. A useful inventory identifies the workplace, activity, workforce, responsible person and risks. Registering a monitor demonstrates that administrative step, but does not itself prove that planned measures are implemented or every installation is safe.

Why amendments must be consulted

The original 2014 text should not be used alone. Its amendments include Agreement 127-2026, which revises Article 90 on manual handling of loads. Limits and conditions should be consulted in the applicable wording, alongside task assessment. An outdated table of maximum weights can lead to incorrect preventive decisions.

Application example

A company opens a new warehouse. Before reusing its office plan, it identifies circulation, storage, goods handling and emergencies at the new workplace. It defines responsibilities and measures, organises participation and completes the relevant registrations. It then checks that routes remain clear and working conditions match those described in the plan.

Maintaining evidence

Linking each requirement to an action, an owner and evidence helps review compliance. Documentation should distinguish the regulatory version consulted, amendments incorporated and verification date. Changes in processes, installations or workforce require assessment of their preventive impact; filing a plan without reviewing those variations leaves the workplace’s actual situation unexplained.

References

  1. MINTRAB: Regulations, Government Agreement 229-2014. Official source
  2. MINTRAB: amendment 127-2026 to Agreement 229-2014. Official source
  3. MINTRAB: occupational health and safety services. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 1 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra