Borg scale and perceived exertion

The Borg scale records the intensity of exertion a person perceives during an activity. In ergonomics it complements observation of physical workload.

In brief

The Borg scale records the intensity of exertion a person perceives during an activity. In ergonomics it complements observation of physical workload.

Contents
  1. What it measures and which versions exist
  2. Its role in prevention
  3. How to collect a useful response
  4. How to interpret results
  5. Application example
  6. Mistakes to avoid
  7. Related concepts
  8. References

A–Z dictionary →

What it measures and which versions exist

The scales developed by Gunnar Borg relate sensations of exertion to values and descriptors. RPE uses a range from 6 to 20; CR10 belongs to a family of category-ratio scales. They are not interchangeable ways of recording the same result: each has its own instructions, references and uses. The version used should always be identified.

Its role in prevention

In a pushing, gripping or handling task, knowing perceived exertion helps identify difficulties that a photograph of the workstation might conceal. It can be used when comparing tools or task modifications within an assessment led by competent staff. If an ergonomic method prescribes a particular scale, that version and its procedure must be followed.

Choosing the instrument is part of selecting the ergonomic assessment methods available for each exposure.

How to collect a useful response

Before asking, explain which sensation is being rated: overall exertion or a localised demand, according to the protocol. The person should know the instructions and respond about a defined task and moment. The assessor records duration, pace, tool and working conditions. Suggesting a score or showing colleagues’ responses introduces avoidable bias.

How to interpret results

The value describes a perception; it does not directly measure kilograms, muscular force or damage. A change may relate to a different tool, accumulated duration, learning or other conditions. Retaining context is therefore more useful than ranking workers. The response does not replace measurements or establish medical fitness or absence of risk.

Application example

In a hypothetical example, a team trials two handles for a repeated operation. Grip is observed and perceived exertion recorded using the same instructions after comparable periods. One option appears less demanding, but the team also checks that it does not increase wrist deviation or errors. The decision combines these data with participation by the people using the equipment.

Mistakes to avoid

An informal zero-to-ten scale should not automatically be treated as a validated Borg scale. Nor should RPE automatically be converted into an individual heart rate, or an isolated score used as a universal limit. Before reproducing or incorporating the instruments into forms, review the rights holder’s conditions of use. This entry explains the concept without reproducing the protected questionnaire.

References

  1. Borg: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Official source
  2. BorgPerception: administración de las escalas. Official source
  3. BorgPerception: preguntas frecuentes y condiciones de uso. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 1 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra