Muting of safety light curtains

Muting is the temporary, automatic suspension of a protective function under conditions defined by the safety system. It can allow material to pass through a protective opening without stopping the process. Its design must maintain protection for people throughout that movement.

In brief

Allowing a pallet through is not permission for a person to enter. The system must recognise valid conditions and restore protection when the intended operation ends.

Contents
  1. A designed function, not defeat
  2. What the assessment must resolve
  3. How blanking differs
  4. A changed-load example
  5. Related concepts
  6. References

A–Z dictionary →

A designed function, not defeat

Disconnecting a barrier to avoid stoppages is not muting. Muting belongs within Machinery safety functions and performance level and responds to a defined process sequence or state. The application must justify it; maintaining output is not sufficient justification.

Sensors and their arrangement distinguish the intended transit conditions. A single detection does not establish safe access: load geometry, movement and remaining gaps all matter.

What the assessment must resolve

Assessment considers whether a person could walk beside the material, follow it or enter elsewhere while the function is suspended. Depending on the installation, physical separation and other complementary measures may be required.

The response to inconsistent signals, interrupted transport and format changes must also be defined. Configuration must prevent an unforeseen condition from leaving protection suspended indefinitely.

How blanking differs

Blanking excludes a defined part of a detection field for an intended application, whereas muting temporarily suspends a function under specific conditions. These are not interchangeable terms for any modification to a barrier.

An excluded zone must not allow undetected access to the hazard either. It requires its own assessment and measures preventing access through free space around the material.

A changed-load example

A hypothetical line uses muting for pallets with a specified geometry. Narrower packages introduce side gaps. Continued recognition of the pallet by the sensors does not demonstrate that the new load preserves the original protection.

Before the change, geometry, access routes and the combined response are reviewed. Retain the authorised configuration and test results. Repeated faults require investigation without bridging sensors. Recovery of a jammed load needs a specific procedure and trained personnel, rather than improvised entry through the opening.

Checks should cover normal transit and foreseeable interruptions, such as a stopped load, missing signal or reversal where applicable. The technical owner should document the expected response in each case. A successful test with one pallet does not represent every authorised geometry and condition. Recovery arrangements must preserve protection while the cause is investigated.

References

  1. Pilz — Muting. Official source
  2. Pilz — Blanking. Official source
  3. HSE — HSG180: Application of electro-sensitive protective equipment. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 2 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra