Reverberation time in workplaces

Reverberation time describes how long sound persists in a room. It informs acoustic treatment but does not replace measurement of personal noise exposure.

In brief

Reverberation time describes how long sound persists in a room. It informs acoustic treatment but does not replace measurement of personal noise exposure.

Contents
  1. Sound after the source stops
  2. Why it matters at work
  3. What determines the result
  4. Absorption is not sound insulation
  5. Selecting useful treatment
  6. Checking the improvement
  7. Related concepts
  8. References

A–Z dictionary →

Sound after the source stops

Reflections from walls, ceilings and other surfaces mean that sound does not disappear immediately when a source stops. Reverberation time characterises this decay. Conventionally, it refers to the time required for a 60-decibel reduction. It is expressed in seconds and describes an acoustic property of a room, rather than the noise dose received by an individual worker.

Why it matters at work

Where reflections are strong, machine noise and conversations can persist and make communication difficult. In classrooms, meeting rooms, dining areas or workshops, this may increase disturbance and the effort needed to be understood. The importance of the parameter depends on how the room is used. A single acoustic response is not appropriate for every type of space.

What determines the result

Room volume, surfaces, materials and contents all influence the result. Absorption varies with frequency, so a single figure may conceal important differences. Measurement conditions, including occupancy and furniture, should be recorded. Comparing an empty room with a fully furnished one without explaining the difference can lead to incorrect conclusions about the benefit of an intervention.

Absorption is not sound insulation

Adding absorption reduces some reflected sound within a room. It is not the same as preventing transmission through a wall, and it does not eliminate direct sound from a machine. These are different problems requiring different solutions. Occupational noise control may require action at the source as well as improvements to the room’s acoustic characteristics.

Selecting useful treatment

Materials should be selected for performance at relevant frequencies and compatibility with cleaning, moisture, impacts and workplace safety. Position and treated area matter as much as the product. Decorative panels installed without studying the problem may not provide the required result. Assessment should establish whether direct sound, reflections or transmission from another space is the dominant issue. Industrial installations must preserve access, visibility and the safe operation of machinery, services and other equipment.

Checking the improvement

After intervention, measure or verify room behaviour under comparable conditions. Review speech intelligibility, disturbance and levels at affected workstations as well. A shorter reverberation time does not automatically demonstrate compliance with personal exposure limits. Conclusions should distinguish room acoustic quality, transmission between rooms and hygienic assessment of the people working there, rather than treating them as one interchangeable outcome.

References

  1. INSST — NTP960. Official source
  2. HSE — Workplace acoustic design. Official source
  3. NIOSH — Engineering noise controls. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 2 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra