SATIN: working conditions and wellbeing questionnaire

SATIN explores workers’ perceptions of their working conditions and health to inform preventive changes.

In brief

A French questionnaire with a manual and analysis tools, rather than a clinical diagnostic test.

Contents
  1. What SATIN investigates
  2. What its results mean
  3. Prepare a responsible application
  4. Feed back and improve
  5. Related concepts
  6. References

A–Z dictionary →

What SATIN investigates

SATIN was developed by INRS and a psychology laboratory in Nancy, now part of the University of Lorraine. It combines information about work and perceived health to support psychosocial risk assessment and decisions about interventions.

Version 3.0 published by its developers covers personal and occupational identification, perceived health, demands and capabilities, the working environment and an overall appraisal of work. A supplementary module is reserved for occupational health services. Using the tool requires understanding the manual and separating information flows appropriately.

What its results mean

The approach recognises that people experiencing the same environment may assess it differently. Such a difference does not automatically make an answer incorrect or establish that someone has a disorder. Findings describe perceptions relevant to understanding work, rather than providing individual medical diagnoses.

The kit supports processing responses and presenting results. Altering questions, response options or scoring rules may change interpretation. An improvised English or Spanish translation does not establish psychometric equivalence with the studied version of the questionnaire.

Prepare a responsible application

Define the population, purpose, data access arrangements, feedback process and intervention resources before administration. INRS presents it for businesses with more than fifty employees and warns of identification risks in small groups. This is not a rule guaranteeing anonymity once a particular number is exceeded.

Check who participates and who is missing. For example, a strong overall response may conceal limited participation among night workers. Looking only at the average could leave people working under different conditions without an effective voice in the assessment.

Feed back and improve

Feedback should focus on aggregated findings and organisational issues that can be discussed without identifying individuals. Where areas differ, examine tasks, resources and conditions before attributing results to personal characteristics or attitudes.

Preventive value comes from agreeing changes and reviewing their effects. SATIN does not replace observation, professional listening or healthcare that someone may need. Conducting a survey alone does not demonstrate that an intervention has been completed or that its intended improvements have occurred.

References

  1. INRS: questionnaire SATIN. Official source
  2. Autores de SATIN: versión 3.0 y kit. Official source
  3. INRS: ficha de evaluación FRPS 08. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 2 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra