SOBANE and Deparis: participatory risk prevention

SOBANE organises prevention into four levels, combining knowledge of actual work with specialist input as complexity increases.

In brief

Déparis begins a practical dialogue about problems and solutions.

Contents
  1. A strategy rather than one score
  2. The role of Déparis
  3. A practical example
  4. Conditions for useful participation
  5. Related concepts
  6. References

A–Z dictionary →

A strategy rather than one score

SOBANE combines Screening, Observation, Analysis and Expertise. The strategy promoted by Belgium’s labour administration uses available knowledge and brings in specialist assistance when a problem requires it. It aims to connect practical improvements with progressively deeper examination of unresolved issues.

It relates to participatory ergonomics but covers wider aspects of working conditions. It is neither a universal scale converting every risk into a number nor permission to omit assessments or measurements required by the legislation applicable to the activity.

The role of Déparis

Déparis is the discussion guide used at the initial level. People familiar with the work consider conditions, difficulties and possible improvements together. The approach seeks solutions from the start rather than devoting all effort to describing problems without assigning action.

Observation examines remaining issues more closely. Analysis adds appropriate preventive expertise, while the expert level addresses particularly complex situations. Technical need determines when support is required; teams should not delay necessary assistance merely to complete a sequence of meetings first.

A practical example

In a workshop, an initial discussion might identify poorly positioned tools and difficulty reporting a malfunction. Some organisational improvements could be agreed immediately. If noise exposure is also uncertain, an appropriate technical assessment and any necessary interim protection will still be required.

Different problems therefore need not wait for the same stage. Record what can be resolved, where additional information is needed, who will take responsibility and when the result will be reviewed with the people performing the work.

Conditions for useful participation

Participation requires time, trust and an ability to influence decisions. A meeting that simply endorses decisions already made by management loses the knowledge the strategy is intended to capture. Shifts or groups absent from the initial discussion should also be heard.

Follow-up checks whether solutions genuinely improve conditions and whether they create new difficulties. SOBANE complements preventive competence rather than replacing it. Adaptation to another country or sector must respect local duties and explain why the selected tools are appropriate for the specific working situation.

References

  1. SPF Emploi: stratégie SOBANE et méthode Déparis. Official source
  2. FOD Werkgelegenheid: manual SOBANE y Déparis, capítulos3–4. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 2 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra