Supreme Decree 132: mining safety in Chile

DS 132 establishes Chile’s Mining Safety Regulation; its requirements must be read with applicable amendments.

In brief

Scope, responsibilities and the relationship between mining authorisation and preventive control of operations.

Contents
  1. What the Mining Safety Regulation is
  2. Applicability and operation characteristics
  3. Roles of the authority and enterprise
  4. Conditions requiring review
  5. Resumption example
  6. Information for decisions
  7. Related concepts
  8. References

A–Z dictionary →

What the Mining Safety Regulation is

Supreme Decree 132, enacted in 2002 and published in 2004, establishes the consolidated text of Chile’s mining regulation. Its objective includes protection of people and installations in the extractive industry. The reference version must be checked in the Library of the National Congress. A historical copy bearing the same number may omit amendments relevant to a particular operation or procedure.

Applicability and operation characteristics

The regulation contains general provisions and others linked to specific operations and characteristics. A project’s scale, activity and complexity may determine particular procedures and requirements. A small-mining rule cannot automatically be transferred to a different operation. Analysis must identify the actual site, auxiliary work and conditions under which activities take place.

Roles of the authority and enterprise

SERNAGEOMIN acts within the mining-safety framework and in approval and inspection procedures under its competence. The enterprise retains responsibilities for execution and control of conditions. Submitting a project is not equivalent to obtaining approval, and approval does not remove the need to maintain measures during operation. Changes must be analysed under the procedure applicable to them.

Conditions requiring review

Mining combines stability, traffic, ventilation, equipment and emergency aspects, among others. The regulation includes requirements for operations and resuming work in specified circumstances. From a management perspective, technical observations need follow-up and responsible people must know their status. An inspection record without a response can preserve evidence of a hazard without reducing exposure.

Resumption example

When activity has been interrupted, a team should not assume conditions remain unchanged merely because the same equipment is still present. Stability, water, ventilation or access may have changed. Prior technical review and resulting measures must reflect the operation’s characteristics. This example prescribes neither entry methods nor tests: it illustrates why authorisation must rest on current conditions.

Information for decisions

The entry on occupational risks in mining and quarrying broadens the context. Specific Chilean obligations require the updated regulation and competent authority’s instructions. Project, operational and preventive records must be linkable without confusing a planned description with evidence of execution. This distinction helps identify when a modification needs review before work continues.

References

  1. BCN: Decree 132, consolidated version. Official source
  2. SERNAGEOMIN: mining-project procedures. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 1 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra