Spain · National · Royal Decree

Royal Decree 1299/2006 · Occupational disease schedule and reporting

In force, with annex amendments in 2015 and 2018

Current official Spanish title: Real Decreto 1299/2006, de 10 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba el cuadro de enfermedades profesionales en el sistema de la Seguridad Social y se establecen criterios para su notificación y registro.

On this page
  1. What it regulates
  2. Who it applies to
  3. Key provisions
  4. History and versions
  5. Transitional provisions and application notes
  6. Official BOE legal relationships
  7. Official sources
  8. Explore the concepts in Sabentis Explore

What it regulates

Approves the Social Security occupational disease schedule and distinguishes it from a supplementary list of diseases suspected of occupational origin. It allocates classification, communication and reporting roles to managing or cooperating institutions, medical practitioners and employers. Its preventive value lies in identifying harm, reporting suspected work-related disease and improving information on workplace exposures.

Who it applies to

The Social Security system and the actors involved in identifying and reporting occupational disease. This record focuses on Articles 1–5, the annexes and communication rules; classification of an individual case requires the relevant legal framework and competent decision-maker.

Key provisions

Annex 1 contains the approved schedule; Annex 2 lists suspected occupational diseases that may be added later. Inclusion in the second list is not, by itself, recognition as an occupational disease.

Article 1

Updating the schedule follows a specific procedure involving health reports and the National Commission on Safety and Health at Work. An employer cannot amend the official classification.

Article 2

Classification belongs to the managing institution, without prejudice to processing by cooperating institutions. It also determines occupational origin where the person is not registered as active in the system.

Article 3

The managing or cooperating institution prepares and processes the report; the employer must provide requested information it holds. Employer duties under Article 23 of the Occupational Risk Prevention Act remain applicable.

Article 4

National Health System practitioners and, where applicable, prevention-service practitioners must communicate the specified cases and suspicions through the regional channel to the competent institution. Reporting a suspicion and formally classifying it are distinct acts.

Article 5

The coded schedule includes asbestos-related laryngeal cancer following the 2015 amendment and lung cancer associated with inhalation of free-silica dust following the 2018 amendment, subject to the activities and conditions specified in each entry.

Annex 1

History and versions

Initial publication: 19/12/2006 · Initial entry into force: 01/01/2007

BOE-A-2006-22169

Published on 19 December 2006 and in force from 1 January 2007. The checked record contains two textual amendments to the annexes and implementation of the report through Order TAS/1/2007. The latest recorded text version was published on 5 May 2018 and took effect on 6 May 2018.

Royal Decree 257/2018: published on 5 May 2018, effective from 6 May 2018. Adds lung cancer from inhalation of free-silica dust to Group 6.

Publication: 05/05/2018 · Effective date: 06/05/2018

BOE-A-2018-6046

Royal Decree 1150/2015: published on 19 December 2015, effective from 20 December 2015. Moves asbestos-related laryngeal cancer into Annex 1 and removes it from the supplementary Annex 2 list.

Publication: 19/12/2015 · Effective date: 20/12/2015

BOE-A-2015-13874

Order TAS/1/2007 was published on 4 January 2007 and entered into force on 5 January with effect from 1 January 2007. It develops the report form, preparation and electronic transmission. It is procedural implementation, not a textual amendment to the disease schedule.

BOE-A-2007-186
All text versions recorded by the BOE

Publication and effective dates are different. The table retains the dates and provisions of each recorded text version; it does not treat future transitional deadlines as requirements already applicable.

Transitional provisions and application notes

  • The transitional provision retained earlier reporting rules until the new form and procedure were approved. Order TAS/1/2007 developed electronic reporting; this historical transition cannot justify omitting current notification duties.

    Transitional provision sole
  • Royal Decree 1995/1978 and the schedule annexed to Decree 3772/1972 were repealed. Repeal of that annex must not be extended without a legal basis to the entire 1972 decree.

    Repealing provision sole
  • The schedule does not replace risk assessment or exhaust all work-related harm. Absence from Annex 1 does not automatically exclude other legally available protection or investigation routes.

    Article 1
  • Publication was on 19 December 2006 and entry into force on 1 January 2007. The BOE database update in 2025 is not a new amendment to the annexes.

    Final provision third

Official BOE legal relationships

Relationships may affect only specific provisions. They do not by themselves determine the status of the whole instrument: consult its history and application notes.

Earlier references (3)
Subsequent references (3)

Official sources

Official sources checked on 14/11/2026. Updating a database record does not by itself mean that the legislation has been amended.

  1. BOE-A-2006-22169
  2. BOE-A-2006-22169
  3. ELI identifier
  4. BOE-A-2007-186
  5. BOE-A-2015-13874
  6. BOE-A-2018-6046

Official BOE sources consulted on 14 November 2026. Consolidation is informative and has no legal force; the official publication must be consulted for legal purposes. The history of the checked record is retained without claiming complete coverage of case law or implied amendments.

Sabentis editorial translation into English; it is not an official translation and does not replace the official text.

Editorial information

Publication date: 14 November 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis editorial team.

Editorial review by Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the International ORP Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra