Refractory ceramic fibres and mineral wools

Refractory ceramic fibres and mineral wools are used as insulating materials, but are not a uniform hazard category. Prevention begins with identifying the product and its condition. New, degraded and high-temperature service insulation may require different assessments.

In brief

Fibrous insulation must be identified before intervention. Not all mineral wools share the classification of refractory ceramic fibres. Assessment considers release, material condition, appropriate measurement and controls during installation, maintenance, removal and final management.

Contents
  1. Do not identify by appearance
  2. Assess the material after use
  3. Locate fibre-releasing tasks
  4. Choose coherent sampling
  5. Apply controls according to classification
  6. Verify before closing the work
  7. Hypothetical example: furnace repair
  8. Related concepts
  9. References

A–Z dictionary →

Do not identify by appearance

INFOCARQUIM lists certain refractory ceramic fibres as category 1B carcinogens. This classification must not automatically be applied to every glass or rock wool, or ruled out because of similar appearance.

Manufacturer documentation, a safety data sheet and information about the installed material are needed. Old insulation of unknown identity may require specialist characterisation, including checking for possible asbestos.

Assess the material after use

INSST’s NTP 642 notes that certain refractory insulation may contain crystalline silica after high-temperature use. Information about the original product may therefore not fully describe the material being removed.

Assessment must consider service history, degradation and planned operations. Measurements taken while installing new material should not be extrapolated to demolition or removal.

Locate fibre-releasing tasks

Cutting, fitting, handling and removal may release fibres or dust. Include cleaning, bagging, internal transport and maintenance of extraction systems, not only installation.

Planning must identify nearby workers and prevent contamination of other areas. Even a brief task may require controls if it generates significant emissions.

Choose coherent sampling

NTP 642 distinguishes fibre-count assessment from particle-mass measurement. The results are not interchangeable. The method must correspond to the material and current reference value, checked in the LEP database.

A count or weighing does not always identify the material’s nature. Characterisation and quantification answer different questions and must be planned with the laboratory.

Apply controls according to classification

In Spain, Royal Decree 374/2001 applies, and where appropriate Royal Decree 665/1997. Consider alternatives, supply forms and working methods that reduce release and handling.

Containment, extraction and appropriate cleaning take priority over reliance solely on personal protection. Clothing and waste must be managed to avoid spreading fibres to changing rooms, vehicles or shared areas.

Verify before closing the work

Completion must include review of cleaning, waste and conditions for returning the area to normal use. Protective equipment is selected according to exposure and task, with instructions for removal without spreading contamination.

Results and material identification must be retained for future interventions. Recording the insulation installed avoids repeating uncertainty at the next maintenance activity.

Hypothetical example: furnace repair

Before removing insulation, a company retrieves its documentation and reviews service conditions. It establishes that assessment must consider aged material, not just the new replacement’s data sheet.

It plans characterisation, removal and cleaning with appropriate resources. The procedure clearly distinguishes removed insulation from the material to be installed afterwards.

References

  1. INSST INFOCARQUIM: refractory ceramic fibres. Official source
  2. INSST NTP 642: assessment and control; technical criteria, not historical limits. Official source
  3. Royal Decree 374/2001. Official source
  4. Royal Decree 665/1997. Official source
  5. INSST: current occupational exposure limits. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 19 October 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra