Sulphur dioxide at work

Sulphur dioxide, SO₂, may be present as a gas used in a process or as an emission generated during an activity. Prevention requires recognising both situations. The risk depends not only on having an identified cylinder or container, but on operations that may release the gas.

In brief

Sulphur dioxide can cause significant respiratory effects. Prevention identifies sources and emitting tasks, controls releases and assesses brief and repeated exposures. Management must include maintenance, incidents and particularly susceptible people, with risk-based health surveillance.

Contents
  1. Identify the gas correctly
  2. Recognise respiratory effects
  3. Locate when releases occur
  4. Prioritise containment and extraction
  5. Measure for a defined purpose
  6. Prepare protection and response
  7. Hypothetical example: opening equipment
  8. Related concepts
  9. References

A–Z dictionary →

Identify the gas correctly

ICSC 0074 identifies sulphur dioxide by CAS 7446-09-5 and also lists the name sulphurous anhydride. It must not be confused with hydrogen sulphide or other gases present in industrial processes.

Identification must draw on raw materials, safety data sheets and process knowledge. When gas is generated during work, its absence from the purchasing inventory does not demonstrate that exposure does not occur.

Recognise respiratory effects

The international card describes irritation of the eyes and respiratory tract, with possible asthma-like reactions and effects that are not always immediate. A release may rapidly generate harmful concentrations.

Contact with liquefied gas adds a risk of cold injury. Assessment must consider physical state and supply form as well as gas toxicity.

Locate when releases occur

Spain’s Royal Decree 374/2001 requires assessment of the nature, extent and duration of exposure. Routine operation, equipment opening, cleaning, maintenance and abnormal situations must be distinguished.

Observe the actual task and people nearby. An automated process may still create exposure during equipment intervention, sampling or waste handling.

Prioritise containment and extraction

Prevention must examine alternatives and methods that avoid or reduce release. Where a localised source exists, extraction and enclosure must suit the process and be checked under actual working conditions.

General ventilation can complement measures, but must not be presumed sufficient for an intense emission or one close to the breathing zone. Maintaining controls is part of ensuring their effectiveness.

Measure for a defined purpose

The sampling strategy must represent relevant operations and use a method suitable for SO₂. Comparisons use current references and consistent periods, available in the INSST occupational exposure limits database.

A single reading outside the emission period does not characterise the entire shift. Document the activity being performed, controls operating and changes that could invalidate the result.

Prepare protection and response

Respiratory and eye protection selection must follow the assessment. Intervention in a leak or unknown atmosphere requires a different approach from routine work and cannot be improvised using whatever equipment is available.

The procedure must establish notification, withdrawal and care for potentially exposed people. Health professionals assess particular susceptibility and appropriate surveillance, respecting confidentiality and without replacing technical controls with medical examinations.

Hypothetical example: opening equipment

A company records discomfort during an occasional opening operation, although measurements during normal operation did not represent the same scenario. It investigates process composition and confirms that SO₂ must be assessed during that operation.

It reviews the working method, improves containment and checks exposure during the task. The conclusion is based on the problematic operation rather than extrapolating the previous measurement.

References

  1. ILO/WHO: ICSC 0074, sulphur dioxide. Official source
  2. Royal Decree 374/2001: chemical agent assessment and control. Official source
  3. INSST: current occupational exposure limits. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 19 October 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra