Workplace harassment

Workplace harassment, also known as psychological harassment at work or mobbing, is the repeated and prolonged exposure of one or more individuals to acts of psychological violence by another person or persons acting from a position of power, not necessarily hierarchical, with the purpose or effect of creating a hostile or humiliating environment that disrupts the victim’s work life, according to the definition in INSST Technical Prevention Note 854. In Spain, it is a psychosocial risk that must be assessed and prevented in accordance with Law 31/1995. It constitutes a violation of the right to dignity and integrity recognized in the Workers’ Statute and, in its serious forms, a crime defined in Article 173.1 of the Penal Code.

In short

Repeated and prolonged psychological violence perpetrated from a position of power creates a hostile environment and harms the health of the affected person (NTP 854 of the INSST). This constitutes a psychosocial risk that the company must assess and prevent (Law 31/1995), a violation of the right to dignity (Workers’ Statute), and a crime in its serious forms (Article 173.1 of the Penal Code). It requires an action protocol and organizational preventive measures.

Content
  1. What is workplace harassment and what is not
  2. Applicable legal framework in Spain
  3. Prevention and intervention
  4. Organizational application: how to prevent and manage harassment
  5. Limits and common mistakes
  6. Practical example
  7. Regulatory framework in Spain
  8. Related concepts
  9. On the blog
  10. References

A–Z dictionary →

What is workplace harassment and what is not

Workplace harassment is characterized by three elements: harassing behaviors (isolation, discrediting, overloading or stripping of duties, humiliation, threats), their repetition and prolongation over time, and a power imbalance between the harasser and the victim, which can be hierarchical (downward or upward) or between equals (horizontal). Its effect is the degradation of the work environment and damage to the health of the affected person, including anxiety, sleep disturbances, depressive symptoms, and deterioration of their social and professional life.

Not all conflict is harassment. Disagreements, isolated interpersonal conflicts, the legitimate exercise of management authority (task assignment, performance evaluation, justified disciplinary sanctions), or pressure to meet demanding objectives do not in themselves constitute harassment, although they can be psychosocial risk factors that require management. This distinction is relevant for legal classification and for choosing the appropriate response: mediation, conflict management, or activation of the harassment protocol.

Workplace harassment differs from sexual harassment and harassment based on sex, as defined in Organic Law 3/2007, and from discriminatory harassment for other reasons, although companies often include them in a single protocol. ILO Convention 190, ratified by Spain, encompasses all these behaviors under the concept of violence and harassment in the world of work.

Applicable legal framework in Spain

  • Law 31/1995. Harassment is a psychosocial risk that the employer must assess and prevent under the duty of protection (articles 14 and 16); its omission may constitute a serious infringement in accordance with the LISOS.
  • Workers’ Statute. Right to respect for privacy and due consideration for dignity, including protection against harassment (Article 4.2.e); harassment is grounds for disciplinary dismissal (Article 54.2.g) and for termination with compensation at the worker’s request (Article 50).
  • Penal Code, article 173.1. Crime of workplace harassment: repeated hostile or humiliating acts, within the scope of an employment or civil service relationship and taking advantage of a superior relationship, which constitute serious harassment against the victim.
  • Organic Law 3/2007. Obligation of companies to promote conditions that prevent sexual harassment and harassment based on sex and to establish specific procedures for its prevention and reporting.
  • Law 15/2022, comprehensive law for equal treatment and non-discrimination. It defines discriminatory harassment and strengthens prevention obligations.
  • Technical Criterion 69/2009 of the Labour and Social Security Inspectorate . Actions of the Inspectorate in matters of harassment and violence at work, with criteria on the responsibility of employers for not preventing or not acting.
  • ILO Convention 190. International framework on violence and harassment in the world of work, with a preventive and inclusive approach.

Prevention and intervention

  • Primary prevention. Psychosocial risk assessment , clear work organization, respectful leadership, conflict management, and a zero-tolerance policy communicated to all staff.
  • Protocol of action. Written procedure, negotiated with the representatives, with a confidential communication channel, investigation of the complaint by trained persons, precautionary measures, deadlines and guarantees for all parties, including protection against reprisals.
  • Intervention. Impartial investigation, proportionate organizational or disciplinary measures, support for the affected person and follow-up.
  • Health surveillance. Detection of harm and coordination with the prevention service while respecting confidentiality. Leymann’s LIPT-60 , an inventory of psychological harassment behaviors, can support this detection without replacing the psychosocial risk assessment.
  • Training. Managers and staff trained in identifying behaviors, prevention and use of the protocol.

Organizational application: how to prevent and manage harassment

  1. Approve and communicate a declaration of principles of zero tolerance towards harassment, endorsed by management and consulted with representatives.
  2. Include harassment and violence in the assessment of psychosocial risks and in preventive planning.
  3. Develop a protocol with a confidential channel, a formed investigating committee, deadlines, precautionary measures, guarantees of impartiality and protection against reprisals.
  4. To train managers and staff in the identification of harassment behaviors, the difference with conflict and the functioning of the protocol.
  5. Act immediately upon receiving any communication, document the investigation, and take proportionate and verifiable measures.
  6. Coordinate with the prevention service the health care of the affected people and the subsequent follow-up.
  7. Review the protocol periodically and record indicators (communications received, response times, results) with guarantees of confidentiality.

Preventive management software allows for the recording of psychosocial assessments, training, and resulting actions, and for the documentation of protocol actions with traceability and restricted access.

Limits and common mistakes

  1. Labeling any interpersonal conflict as harassment, or denying harassment by reducing it to a conflict between equals.
  2. Having a formal protocol without training, without a real confidential channel, and without the will to apply it.
  3. Delaying action after a report or demanding impossible proof from the affected person before investigating.
  4. Adopting the transfer of the victim as the only measure, which may constitute retaliation.
  5. Confusing the legitimate exercise of managerial power with harassment, or using that confusion to protect abusive behavior.
  6. Failure to document actions, which prevents proving business diligence before the Inspection or the courts.

The legal classification of a situation as harassment is the responsibility of the competent authorities; this information sheet is for informational purposes only and does not replace professional advice.

Practical example

Situation: A service company with 150 people receives, through the confidential channel, a communication from an administrative worker describing repeated disqualifications and isolation by her direct supervisor for eight months.

  • Activation. The investigating committee, made up of a prevention technician and a human resources person from outside the department, opens a file within 48 hours and adopts as a precautionary measure the temporary modification of the hierarchical dependency without prejudice to the affected party.
  • Investigation. Interviews with the parties already witnessed, review of communications provided and analysis of the department’s work organization.
  • Resolution. Confirmation of repeated hostile conduct; disciplinary sanction for the responsible party, support plan for the affected party with the prevention service and review of the psychosocial evaluation of the area.
  • Follow-up. Verification at three and six months, specific training for commanders and recording of actions with restricted access.

Regulatory framework in Spain

In Colombia, Law 1010 of 2006 regulates workplace harassment and requires workplace coexistence committees; in other countries the issue is addressed through equality, risk prevention or criminal regulations.

Related concepts

On the blog

References

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NTP 854: Psychological harassment at work: definition. 2009. Official source
  2. Official State Gazette. Law 31/1995, of November 8, on Occupational Risk Prevention. 1995, current consolidated text. Official source
  3. Official State Gazette. Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23, Workers’ Statute. 2015, current consolidated text. Official source
  4. Official State Gazette. Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code, Article 173. 1995, current consolidated text. Official source
  5. Official State Gazette. Organic Law 3/2007, of March 22, for the effective equality of women and men. 2007, current consolidated text. Official source
  6. Official State Gazette. Instrument of ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the World of Work (ILO Convention 190). 2022. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: August 30, 2026 .

Editorial Manager: Sabentis Editorial Team .

Editorial review by Pablo Rodríguez LinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra